Why is it written as lots of, very short, paragraphs, often only comprising a sentence or two? I would suggest it be redrafted as longer paragraphs of continuous prose. Kjp1 ( talk ) 10:18, (UTC) Konstantin Khabensky edit Article ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch watch peer review i've listed this article for peer review because i am interested in knowing if it fulfills the ga criteria. Thanks, Er nesto ( talk ) 06:55, (UTC) Bring me the horizon edit Previous peer review Article ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch watch peer review In case i ever get to this one, i'd like to know. Thanks, dannymusiceditor oops 16:55, (UTC) Comment need to look at the references and reviews standardise on using last/first or first/last format for authors and editors. Probably last/first is more appropriate as you are using that format in the bibliography section. Keith D ( talk ) 12:38, (UTC) Floodland (album) edit Article ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch watch peer review i've listed this article for peer review because i've been considering nominating it for ga status.
The areas I think that need review are the writing style and maintaining a neutral point of view. Thanks, nicklausAU ( talk ) 12:42, (UTC) you can't do this per Step 4 of the pr instructions. This is, however, probably the result of me being just a little too ambiguous by saying "nominating the article for review" - i apologize for that. What I meant was when the review came, well obviously, you'd get that without even asking for. That's what ga reviews are, after all, right? Sorry to have caused trouble. Dannymusiceditor oops 04:25, (UTC) Christopher Lambert edit Article essay ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch watch peer review i've listed this article for peer review because it has recently undergone major improvements after user Filmman3000 edited it, and. Thanks, Er nesto ( talk ) 07:35, (UTC) A quick, drive-by observation.
AmericanAir88 ( talk ) 15:38, (UTC) Edge (video game) edit Article ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch watch peer review i've listed this article for peer review because i wanted to see what I'm missing before i submit. Thanks, Blue pumpkin pie ( talk ) 17:31, (UTC) Passing comment: the gameplay section needs more sources. Joe bro 64 00:41, (UTC) The review scores should be pulled out of prose and placed into a review table. See template:Video game reviews for help on putting it together. I'd recommend creating a multi-platform table. TarkusAB talk 12:28, (UTC) Exo (band) edit Article ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch watch peer review i've listed this article for peer review because i'm currently trying to get it to ga status. It's been nominated, but hasn't been touched in almost 2 weeks and will likely take a long time, so i'd like to use this time to get it as ready as possible.
HoverWatch review : only real information from its users
Also, it is less than 100kb, (100kb up are the the "Almost certainly should be divided" band). Being 74kb, it actually fits in the lower end of "Probably should be divided (although the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading material. Lastly, what do you mean by the spelling points? "fulfill" and "catalog" are spelled correctly? Thank you for your input. theSandDoctor Talk 01:05, (UTC) I don't know anything about pop music and can't suggest what specifically you need to prune. The fact remains that at 12,161 words the article is far too long to be readable.hotel
One loses the will to live when confronted with yet another list of concert venues. The "musical development" and "legacy" sections per contra are admirably succinct. On the spelling I was assuming that as the rolling Stones is an English group you would be using English spelling rather than American. Tim riley talk 05:59, (UTC) Describing the Stones as "pop music" raised a smile here; except for maybe briefly around the early days of Andrew loog Oldham 's management, they've never been "pop"! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:15, (UTC) toy story edit Previous peer review Article ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch watch peer review i've listed this writing article for peer review because i want to make sure that the article. I want to nominate it for featured article, so i have to do this first. Thanks, jennete76 ( talk ) 21:32, (UTC) source review edit sources 79 and 128 are dead.
Thank you in advance. Your input is greatly appreciated. — miss Sarita 19:10, (UTC) Chinese democracy edit Article ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch watch peer review i've listed this article for peer review because: I have worked significantly on the article and want to expand. Thanks, rf23 ( talk ) 20:29, (UTC) The rolling Stones edit Article ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch watch peer review i've listed this article for peer review after a goce copyedit by Twofingered Typist and per the. My plan is to address any and all concerns raised in hopes to resubmit the article for fa status (successfully) at some point in the (hopefully near) future.
Thank you for your time, theSandDoctor Talk 15:57, (UTC) Comments from Tim riley edit just a couple of points. Length The article is far too long, and needs about 3,000 words pruning. At 226,635 bytes and 74 kb (12719 words) of readable prose, this is in the "Almost certainly should be divided" band. An article that goes on at this extreme length is not one that visitors to wikipedia will be likely to read, and is not fa material. On the other hand, fa criteria 1b and 1c imply the article must cover all ground and not leave things out. Looking at some similar FAs, U2 and Pink Floyd are 64k, david Bowie is 79k, and the Stones have got a lengthier history than all of these. The prose can be tightened up, but I'd be surprised if we can get it under 70K without breaching those two other criteria mentioned here. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:10, (UTC) A couple of spelling points: "fulfill" and "catalog". Tim riley talk 17:20, (UTC) @ Tim riley : What would you recommend moving to a separate article?
How to use, google books - google search
Thanks, micro ( Talk ) 11:46, (UTC) deep Space homer edit Article ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch gpa watch peer review i've listed this article for peer review because it has failed fac. Issues addressed in the fac include not enough sourcing from books and in general. Another issue is failure to meet. Of the fac criteria (i.e. I had generally some support but some users sent a long message of issues and wrote out paragraphs on why it fails fac. I would very much appreciate help on this article to ensure i can get a successful second fac. Thanks, AmericanAir88 ( talk ) 15:35, (UTC) Rx (Medicate) edit Previous peer review Article ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch watch peer review Another request for a peer review of this article; there was no feedback given. Nominated for peer review to make this ga even better and possibly take it do fa in the future. Please short take a minute to leave some constructive criticism and feel free to hit me up if you need something reviewed or commented.
Based on what i've seen from other fl of report singles discography (Madonna's for example). I think that Michael Jackson singles discography meets the fl criteria. If any editors could led their suggestions and/or opinions to help/improve the article, i'd very much appreciate. Thanks, akhiljaxxn ( talk ) 05:11, (UTC) Sandringham house Article ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch watch review This review is too large to display in full. Please go to the review directly if you want to contribute. Date added :, 21:33 utc last edit :, 09:52 utc over the Edge (kayzo and Gammer song) edit Article ( edit visual edit history ) Article talk ( edit history ) watch watch peer review i've listed this article for peer review because after having. I am using this article as a baseline to compare and judge the other articles with and having it reviewed would help me greatly.
editor may comment on a review, and there is no requirement that any comments are acted. A list of all current peer reviews, with reviewers' comments included, can be found here. For easier navigation, a list of peer reviews, without the reviews themselves included, can be found here. A chronological peer reviews list can be found here. Contents, michael Jackson singles discography edit. Article ( edit visual edit history article talk ( edit history ) watch watch peer review i've listed this article for peer review because i think that this article has featured List potential. The list is properly sourced, well written and formated.
Other editors business can comment on the review. Peer review may be used for potential good article nominations, potential featured article candidates, or an article of any " grade ". Peer review is a useful place to centralise a review from other editors about an article, and may be associated with. Wikiproject ; and may also be a good place for new wikipedians to receive feedback on how an article is looking. Peer reviews are open to any feedback, and editors requesting feedback may also request subject-specific feedback. Unlike formal nominations, editors and nominators may both edit articles during the discussion. Compared to the real-world peer review process, where experts themselves take part in reviewing the work of another, the majority of the volunteers here, like most editors in wikipedia, lack expertise in the subject at hand. This is a good thing—it can make technically -worded articles more accessible to the average reader. Those looking for expert input should consider contacting editors on the volunteers list, or contacting a relevant, wikiproject.
In-depth, ez battery reconditioning review, must-read
To write a book review, take thorough notes as you read the book you're reviewing, which will make it easier to write about. When you're done with the book, ask yourself what the major themes and ideas of the book are, and then judge whether the author did a good job presenting them. Also, ask yourself if the characters in the story were developed and believable. In your actual review, make sure you include a brief summary of the story. Then, go on to present your opinions about the book, both good and bad. Did plan this summary help you? Wikipedia's peer review process is a way to receive ideas and feedback from other editors about articles. An article may be nominated by any editor, and will appear on the list of all peer reviews.